Welcome to Carver Yachts Owners Forum

We are a boating forum for owners of Carver Yachts to enthusiastically discuss all aspects of Carver Boat ownership. Whether you are looking for your first Carver or currently own one, you are sure to feel at home on CarverYachtOwners.com

You are currently viewing our board as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to searching the forum topics, post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

366 vs the 355/356

The is the forum to discuss general information regarding all Carver Yachts.
User avatar

United States of America
buster53
Admiral
Admiral
Posts: 1026
Joined: May 12th, 2017, 10:41 am
Vessel Info: 2001, Carver 356
Location: Lower Potomac, VA
Has thanked: 9 times
Been thanked: 261 times

Re: 366 vs the 355/356

Postby buster53 » September 12th, 2017, 9:35 pm

g36, I took a look at the 405/406 and it is a good looking boat. I'm really leaning towards gas power and the 356 should do fine on 7.4's and even better on 8.1's. The size and weight of the 405 pretty much demands diesel.

User avatar

Canada
Lyndon670
Admiral
Admiral
Posts: 657
Joined: July 29th, 2013, 11:35 pm
Vessel Info: 2000 Carver 506
Volvo TAMD74EDC
Location: Georgian Bay
Has thanked: 124 times
Been thanked: 140 times

Re: 366 vs the 355/356

Postby Lyndon670 » September 13th, 2017, 4:45 pm

Thanks g36. I'm sure the 405/406 is a much better boat, but I would prefer to stay in the 356 size range for a number of reasons.
The Cruisers 3650/3750 ( basically the same boat) is really my number #1 choice, but used inventory is very limited and will probably cost an extra 15-20% more than a similar condition/year Carver 356. Those are the top 2 on my short list and I really don't want to go any bigger


We looked long and hard before buying our 506, and a Cruisers 455 was high on our list. The one thing I couldn't get past is that Cruisers still uses coring material below the waterline.

Food for thought.
Lyndon,
2000 Carver 506
FOXY JOE
Volvo 7.4TAMD
Queens Cove Marina
Georgian Bay, Ontario
User avatar

United States of America
buster53
Admiral
Admiral
Posts: 1026
Joined: May 12th, 2017, 10:41 am
Vessel Info: 2001, Carver 356
Location: Lower Potomac, VA
Has thanked: 9 times
Been thanked: 261 times

Re: 366 vs the 355/356

Postby buster53 » September 13th, 2017, 9:05 pm

Thanks Lyndon, good to know
User avatar

Topic author United States of America
km1125
Admiral
Admiral
Posts: 3500
Joined: February 28th, 2017, 6:04 pm
Has thanked: 69 times
Been thanked: 1043 times

Re: 366 vs the 355/356

Postby km1125 » September 14th, 2017, 2:39 pm

Is there a write-up anywhere of all the various Carver models and how they relate to one another? Somewhat of a good "Wiki" page or at least a lot better than the current Carver Yachts Wiki?

Something like this for each model:

"The 3007, 3207, 3607 models are all aft cabin layouts with similar design. They use semi-displacement hulls and will cruise economically below hull speed or just above planing speed. They will typically have a cruise speed of 20-22 MPH and a top speed of 26-28MPH. The 3607 was replaced by the 355 and and 356 in subsequent years (1990 and 1998, respectively) and then the 366 in 2002. While the 355 and 356 share the same hull and have a 'conventional' superstructure look. The 355 modified the salon layout to a more open design based on the "B" interior of the 3607. The 356 also incorporated the non-encapulated stringers and a standard hard top over the aft cabin". The 366 superstructure migrated to the European design, but still is built on the same hull."

(btw, I have no idea if all that is accurate, I was just making it up as I went along)
User avatar

United States of America
buster53
Admiral
Admiral
Posts: 1026
Joined: May 12th, 2017, 10:41 am
Vessel Info: 2001, Carver 356
Location: Lower Potomac, VA
Has thanked: 9 times
Been thanked: 261 times

Re: 366 vs the 355/356

Postby buster53 » October 3rd, 2017, 10:19 am

Another question regarding the 356...
they all come with Kohler gensets. Do they come from the factory with raw or fresh water cooling. I would hope FWC.

United States of America
tomschauer
CYO Supporter
CYO Supporter
Posts: 2307
Joined: March 28th, 2016, 10:52 pm
Vessel Info: 1998 Carver 355
Suspicious Fishes !
2022 Kawasaki 310X
Location: upper chesapeake bay
Has thanked: 324 times
Been thanked: 595 times

Re: 366 vs the 355/356

Postby tomschauer » October 3rd, 2017, 12:59 pm

It depends engine package it was ordered with. Some are raw water, some are fresh. The generator was also an option, although most have it.
User avatar

United States of America
buster53
Admiral
Admiral
Posts: 1026
Joined: May 12th, 2017, 10:41 am
Vessel Info: 2001, Carver 356
Location: Lower Potomac, VA
Has thanked: 9 times
Been thanked: 261 times

Re: 366 vs the 355/356

Postby buster53 » March 5th, 2018, 12:50 pm

buster53 wrote:Source of the post Kind of an older thread....
After looking at both the 356 and 366, I'm seriously leaning towards the 356 as my next boat.
On the 366, I don't care for the instrument panel, the short stubby foredeck and the downward slant of the foredeck looks kind of dangerous. Also, not a fan of the new, Eurostyle type of boat. Prefer the more traditional 356 style.



Just an update...
We do have a 356 under contract and survey is next week. Wish us luck.
All you 355/356 owners, anything specific I should tell my surveyor to look at?
User avatar

United States of America
mjk1040
Admiral
Admiral
Posts: 1518
Joined: July 30th, 2015, 8:15 am
Vessel Info: 1998 355 AC/MY "Deja Vu"
Location: Savannah, NY
Has thanked: 9 times
Been thanked: 242 times

Re: 366 vs the 355/356

Postby mjk1040 » March 5th, 2018, 5:53 pm

Aft 120 gallon aux. fuel tank. They are v bottom and tend to rust out from the inside. Its a $5K+ job to replace them. If you don't need the extra fuel capacity you can just decommission it. Unfortanilty your surveyor has no way to check this. If all the previous owners kept this tank full, especially when it was wintered up you may be fine.
Mike :down:
I'd Rather Be Boating!
1989 Sea Ray Seville
1986 Carver Mariner 32'
1990's Thompson 22' Cuddy Cabin
1990's 4Winns 245 Vista Cruiser
1980's Thompson 19' Open Bow

Canada
Viper
CYO Supporter
CYO Supporter
Posts: 5975
Joined: July 10th, 2015, 9:58 pm
Vessel Info: 1989 Carver 3807 Aft Cabin
Location: Ontario, Canada
Has thanked: 455 times
Been thanked: 1671 times

Re: 366 vs the 355/356

Postby Viper » March 5th, 2018, 6:16 pm

Good luck, hope it works out for you.
User avatar

United States of America
buster53
Admiral
Admiral
Posts: 1026
Joined: May 12th, 2017, 10:41 am
Vessel Info: 2001, Carver 356
Location: Lower Potomac, VA
Has thanked: 9 times
Been thanked: 261 times

Re: 366 vs the 355/356

Postby buster53 » March 5th, 2018, 7:07 pm

mjk1040 wrote:Source of the post Aft 120 gallon aux. fuel tank. They are v bottom and tend to rust out from the inside. Its a $5K+ job to replace them. If you don't need the extra fuel capacity you can just decommission it. Unfortanilty your surveyor has no way to check this. If all the previous owners kept this tank full, especially when it was wintered up you may be fine.


From the very beginning of this boat search, boat buying process, that aft fuel tank has been my biggest concern. My plan is to have a nice chat with my surveyor about it and we will make sure to use that tank for at least part of the sea trial to make sure it's not old, stale gas. I'm hoping the current owner used it enough to have decent fuel replenishment.

Return to “Carver Yachts Forum - Model Discussion”



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 129 guests