Free wheeling

ImageThis forum is for general discussion of all things Boating. If it's boating related and doesn't fit in another forum, post it here!
Post Reply
User avatar
Rocket09
Scurvy Dog
Scurvy Dog
Posts: 15
Joined: March 21st, 2016, 9:35 pm
Vessel Info: Carver Aft 325 - 1995
Location: Montreal, Canada
Been thanked: 2 times

Free wheeling

Post by Rocket09 »

Hello all, I have read my transmission manual and I can use only one engine, but I can not see the advantages of using only one engine while running. Will I really save on gas ? What would be the advantages? Anyone done it ?

Merci
User avatar
tomschauer
Admiral
Admiral
Posts: 2323
Joined: March 28th, 2016, 10:52 pm
Vessel Info: 1998 Carver 355
Suspicious Fishes !
2022 Kawasaki 310X
Location: upper chesapeake bay
Has thanked: 326 times
Been thanked: 602 times

Re: Free wheeling

Post by tomschauer »

if you run on only one engine, you will save some fuel if you are happy running about 4 knots and constantly steering your boat. Much faster, fire up the other one.
User avatar
bobeast
Scurvy Dog
Scurvy Dog
Posts: 11
Joined: May 17th, 2017, 10:10 pm
Location: People's Republik of Kalifornia
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: Free wheeling

Post by bobeast »

You know when you have a sprained ankle you try to run? Yeah its kind of like that. You can do it, but you won't enjoy it.
User avatar
jcoll
Deck Hand
Deck Hand
Posts: 95
Joined: September 10th, 2014, 12:18 am
Vessel Info: 1998 355 Motor yacht
Has thanked: 18 times
Been thanked: 18 times

Re: Free wheeling

Post by jcoll »

If you have dripless shaft seals it's my understanding you'll need to secure the non-running motor's propshaft so as not to damage the seal. Water from the exhaust manifold supplies the seal as a cooling lubricant. While running through the water the prop will spin on the dead motor and cause damage. I suppose you could idle the one motor but the question becomes...... Is it worth it?
Viper
CYO Supporter
CYO Supporter
Posts: 6266
Joined: July 10th, 2015, 9:58 pm
Vessel Info: 1989 Carver 3807 Aft Cabin
Location: Ontario, Canada
Has thanked: 475 times
Been thanked: 1791 times

Re: Free wheeling

Post by Viper »

jcoll wrote:Qr Bbpost If you have dripless shaft seals it's my understanding you'll need to secure the non-running motor's propshaft so as not to damage the seal. Water from the exhaust manifold supplies the seal as a cooling lubricant. While running through the water the prop will spin on the dead motor and cause damage. I suppose you could idle the one motor but the question becomes...... Is it worth it?

+1
Don't know at what speed that becomes a problem and you probably wouldn't be going fast enough on one engine but it's something else you'd need to worry about. Also, if you have the type of dripless that are fed off a manifold from both engines and both dripless logs are plumbed together, there have been cases where water from one log goes through the other log and up to the static engine's manifold. Because there is no exhaust pressure, under the right conditions, the engine can ingest water trying to exit from the elbow. Because of this, Mercury issued a recommendation years ago to do away with the connection between the two logs in case one engine fails while underway so it doesn't ingest water.
User avatar
jcoll
Deck Hand
Deck Hand
Posts: 95
Joined: September 10th, 2014, 12:18 am
Vessel Info: 1998 355 Motor yacht
Has thanked: 18 times
Been thanked: 18 times

Re: Free wheeling

Post by jcoll »

Viper, that makes sense and if anyone should know about water ingestion problems it would be Mercury! They had their fair share of those issues. LOL!
User avatar
Rocket09
Scurvy Dog
Scurvy Dog
Posts: 15
Joined: March 21st, 2016, 9:35 pm
Vessel Info: Carver Aft 325 - 1995
Location: Montreal, Canada
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: Free wheeling

Post by Rocket09 »

Thanks for all your reply, I guess I wil continue with 2 engines.
User avatar
km1125
Admiral
Admiral
Posts: 3657
Joined: February 28th, 2017, 6:04 pm
Has thanked: 81 times
Been thanked: 1114 times

Re: Free wheeling

Post by km1125 »

I've read articles before where they actually tested this and provided data. In some cases it was a pretty minor savings but in others it made sense. Probably depends on the hull a lot and the prop sizes. There was also a difference of opinion on whether it was more efficient to lock the non-running prop or let it freewheel. I don't remember now how that concluded.
Post Reply